Care & Resistance: A Case Study on the Philippine Revolution from Spanish to American Colonization
Care and Resistance was created by Keziah Aurin, Shannon Roughan, Isabel Shiao as part of History of Art 192CU: Social Justice and Museum Studies during Spring 2021. The exhibit is a survey of artifacts collected by Roy Franklin Barton in the years following the United States’ acquisition of the Philippines. Care and Resistance uses these artifacts to highlight the Philippine resistance to colonization.
P vs. F, O vs. X
This exhibit refers to the inhabitants of the Philippines as “Pilipinos,” as opposed to the more familiar terms in the West and the diaspora, “Filipinos,” “Filipinx,” or “Pilipinx.” It is with great intention that we refer to people residing in the mainland, whose national language does not use the letters F or X and consider “Pilipino” as gender-neutral and all-inclusive.
The Treaty of Paris, 1898, and the Philippine-American War
In 1898, the Treaty of Paris settled the war between Spain and the United States. As a result of this treaty, Spain ceded Puerto Rico and Guam and sold the Philippines for $20,000,000. The expansion of US territory beyond its coasts was a realization of the period doctrine of Manifest Destiny and, perhaps, the origins of the US as a global superpower. The American government, media, and academia formulated the narrative of America as modernizing and westernizing savior, a myth that is ultimately false and harmful to Pilipinos. It erases the atrocities the US committed in the Philippines and its other colonies.
Diversity in the Philippines
During the Spanish and later the American era of colonization thousands of tribes were nationalized as Pilipinos. While it has existed for centuries, it is crucial to recognize that the Philippines is not a monolith. Instead, we must keep in mind the diversity within its 7,107 islands—diversity of geography, cultures, languages, physical appearances, and lived experiences. The collective mainstream understanding and teachings of Pilipino history were not, and are not, representative of the diversity of histories, especially of Indigenous Peoples’ history, present in the nation now known as the Republic of the Philippines.
Roy Franklin Barton
Roy Franklin Barton (1883-1947) was a school teacher whose work became the basis of Pilipino anthropology. He conducted extensive research on Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines. He was known for his study on the Ifugao and Kalinga people of the Cordillera and Mountain Provinces region, located north of Luzon. Most, if not all, of the objects found in this exhibit are from his collection. Barton donated most of his collection to the Hearst Museum in 1918.
During his time in the Philippines, Barton wrote the books The Half-Way Sun, Ifugao Law, Kalinga Customs, and Ifugao Mythology, to name a few, which detailed his learnings about cultures and customs in the Cordilleria region. Barton was one of the first Americans to give a description of the Pilipino people, and his findings were the canon of Pilipino ethnographic study in a frame we would not call “salvage” anthropology.
Beyond Barton
While Barton is the primary collector and photographer of the objects presented, this exhibit has no intention of centering him nor his monolithic accounts of Pilipino culture. Instead, we intend to use the objects and photographs he obtained to deepen our understanding of the Philippines’ sociopolitical climate in the early 1900s. Although his collections show the Philippines from a Western voyeuristic perspective, they were the only ones readily available to access at the Hearst Museum. With this in mind, we would also like to recognize the labor and contributions of unnamed Pilipino individuals and groups whose contributions made Barton’s and our projects possible.
In the 2006 article “Archives of the New Possession,” scholar Ricardo L. Punzalan discusses the idea of care imposed by the Spanish and American colonial governments through collections of archives and the nationalizing/centralizing documents that colonists forced on Pilipinos. This creation of national archives is one of many examples of salvage anthropology in the Philippines. Colonial governments collected and recorded identities and everyday practices under the guise of care, although this centralized knowledge offered no real purpose or benefit to the everyday Pilipino person.
However, caring extends beyond documentation and Barton’s approach of “salvaging whatever is left.” By centering Indigenous experiences, we show how Pilipinos preserved their cultures—many of which are still thriving to this day. Through this, we hope to deconstruct the mainstream neutral and monolithic understanding of Pilipino history. We also hope to present alternative perspectives on the Pilipino people that show them not as passive participants to colonization, but as active resistors and protectors of their communities, whether on the battlefield or in everyday life.
War as a Form of Resistance
Photographs depicting Pilipino rebellion and military.
Anarchy as an Act of Care and Resistance
Photographs depicting Ifugaoan people and landscapes.
Symbolic Defiance
Photographs depicting Ifugaoan ceremonies and military parade.
While this exhibit focuses on care and resistance, it is crucial to acknowledge the underlying paradox of examining a museum archive to find objects of resistance. Each photograph, basket, or other artifact within the catalogue continues to inflict colonial harm. Many object labels, for instance, arbitrarily group different native communities into the monolithic “Philippines” category or include blatantly racist descriptions. Moreover, photography as an inherently voyeuristic medium for ethnography underscores the power dynamics present, where the subjects are studied but almost never identified beyond “white” or “native.” The museum’s role as a colonial institution therefore continues to perpetuate anti-indigenous sentiments, intergenerational trauma, and the loss of identities.
If we are to criticize the system that allowed a school teacher to conduct anthropological and ethnographic studies on indigenous people, we must ask the question: How do we reconstruct relationships between objects and collector? One solution is by focusing on care through mutual aid and community – solidarity, not charity. This exhibit does not attempt to define “care,” but proposes different pathways to achieve this goal. We must consider who is being cared for, and who is caring. What do they care for?
Whether or not it is possible to fully decolonize museums remains in question, but this exhibit hopes to address the curators’ obligation to “care” by illuminating suppressed stories.
Further Readings
- Punzalan, R. “Archives of the new possession: Spanish colonial records and the American creation of a ‘national’ archives for the Philippines”
- Lasco, G. “‘Little Brown Brothers’: Height and the Philippine-American Colonial Encounter”
- Barton, R. “The half-way sun”
- Barton, R. “Ifugao law”
- Santiago, F. “Manners of Resistance: Symbolic Defiance of Colonial Authority in Nineteenth Century Philippines”
- Acabado, S. “The Archeology of Pericolonialism: Responses of the ‘Unconquered’ to Spanish Conquest and Colonialism in Ifugao, Philippines”
- (Film) “Aguinaldo’s navy”
- (Film) Tarog, J. “Heneral Luna”
- (Film) Tarog, J. “Goyo”
- Episode 134 – Philippine Archaeology and the Ifugao Rice Terraces with Stephen Acabado https://thisfilipinoamericanlife.com/2021/01/14/episode-134-philippine-archaeology-and-the-ifugao-rice-terraces-with-stephen-acabado-social-distance-series/